The Marketing Innovation Blog

It's no longer marketing as usual.

Nice run, bros

What do you do as a company when an Internet meme leads to increased sales and nationwide exposure? If you are Smirnoff, you shut it down.

BrosIcingBros first began popping up on sites like Tumblr and Twitter. With the internet swirling with the ‘rules’ involved in so called ‘icings’ and plenty of pictures of celebrities and athletes Photoshopped to include an “ice,” Smirnoff had a phenomenon on their hands.

Before long, those Photoshopped images were soon replaced by real photos of actual “icings.” Bros across the country kneeling and accepting their punishment for not being more aware. See, all you have to do to “ice” someone is hand them a (preferably warm) Smirnoff Ice. They are then required to drop to one knee, and chug.

brosicingbros

With wedding and barbecue season kicking into high gear, brosicingbros.com was a hit. There were T-shirts with slogans like “Don’t Ice Me, Bro!” across the country, and even Mark Zuckerberg was “icing bros.”

Yesterday the brosicingbros.com page was dead, with only the headline “We had a good run bros.”  AdAge says Smirnoff parent company Diageo was responsible. In my eyes, it makes total sense that they took down the page – they didn’t want the consumption of their product seen as a punishment for losing a game! But, with all of the recent organic buzz, did they do the right thing by shutting it down? Isn’t there some value to letting this meme run its course, gaining momentum and having them reap the (sales) benefits?

Tags: , , , , , ,

  • I think Diageo did shut it down. Someone, somewhere along the line didn't see the value in letting this group have their fun touting their brand. In my mind it's a terrible move from them. I was iced once and the game had me seriously considering purchasing more of their product to ice others. Now that it's shut down I've reverted to my former stance on the Ice products - never buying them.
  • Well, Smirnoff's parent company (Diageo) is denying that they're connected. Of course, saying it doesn't make it true, but if it does come to light that they created, then they'll look even worse, given the public denial.

    I'm torn on the decision. Either way, they get publicity. If they do nothing, then the meme continues on its natural course and they potentially face legal issues and "tarnishing" of the brand.

    But if they shut the site down, they show that they're attempting to "promote responsible drinking" and the meme could continue on other sites. Of course, there's a risk of a backlash, with new customers getting upset by the steps the company has taken.

    In general, I'm go for "ask forgiveness later" so I think the company should have made some boring "official statement" encouraging people to behave responsibly, but they should have let the site(s) stay up.
  • kyork20
    My bet from the beginning is that they were actually behind it from day one. I'm sticking to that.
blog comments powered by Disqus